zlacker

> It's entirely clear that every last human will be beaten on code design in the upcoming years

In what world is this statement remotely true.

>>acedTr+(OP)
In the world where idle speculation can be passed off as established future facts, i.e., this one I guess.

>>acedTr+(OP)
Proof by negation, I guess?

If someone were to claim: no computer will ever be able to beat humans in code design, would you agree with that? If the answer is "no", then there's your proof.

>>1024co+Ci
Proving things is fun, isn’t it?

But FYI “proof by negation” is better known as the fallacy of excluded middle when applied outside a binary logical system like this.

>>1024co+Ci
That is so only if by “upcoming years” they mean “any point in the future”. I think they meant “soon”, though.

>>acedTr+(OP)
In the delusional startup world.

>>1024co+Ci
> no computer will ever be able to beat humans in code design

If you define "human" to be "average competent person in the field" then absolutely I will agree with it.