zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. panarc+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-05-06 16:54:16
Is it just me that finds that while Gemini 2.5 is able to generate a lot of code that the end results are usually lackluster compared to Claude and even ChatGPT? I also find it hard-headed and frequently does things in ways I explicitly told it not to. The massive context window is pretty great though and enables me to do things I can't with the others so it still gets used a lot.
replies(1): >>scrlk+p
2. scrlk+p[view] [source] 2025-05-06 16:56:33
>>panarc+(OP)
How are you using it?

I find that I get the best results from 2.5 Pro via Google AI Studio with a low temperature (0.2-0.3).

replies(1): >>panarc+k2
◧◩
3. panarc+k2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-06 17:06:02
>>scrlk+p
AI Studio as well, but I haven't played around with the temperature too much and even then I only lowered it to like 0.8 a few times. So I'll have to try this out. Thanks.
[go to top]