zlacker

[parent] [thread] 9 comments
1. GaggiX+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-05-06 15:31:52
You can ask to not use comments or use less comments, you can put this in the system prompt too.
replies(2): >>ChadMo+11 >>blenso+J2
2. ChadMo+11[view] [source] 2025-05-06 15:37:55
>>GaggiX+(OP)
I've tried this, aggressively and it still does it for me. I gave up.
replies(2): >>ziml77+F2 >>koakum+76
◧◩
3. ziml77+F2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-06 15:47:38
>>ChadMo+11
I tried this as well. I'm interfacing with Gemini 2.5 using Cursor and I have rules to to limit the comments. It still ends up over-commenting.
replies(1): >>shawab+Kd
4. blenso+J2[view] [source] 2025-05-06 15:47:44
>>GaggiX+(OP)
Maybe too many comments could be a good metric to check if someone just yolo accepted the result or if they actually checked if it's correct.

I don't have problems with getting lot's of comments in the output, I am just deleting it while reading what it did

replies(1): >>tough+Dm
◧◩
5. koakum+76[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-06 16:02:40
>>ChadMo+11
Have you tried threats?
replies(2): >>throwu+Su >>ChadMo+5ax
◧◩◪
6. shawab+Kd[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-06 16:48:41
>>ziml77+F2
I have a feeling this may be a cursor issue, perhaps cursors system prompt asks for comments? Asking in the aistudio UI for code and ending the prompt with "no code comments" has always worked for me
replies(1): >>ChadMo+UZ2
◧◩
7. tough+Dm[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-06 17:39:24
>>blenso+J2
another great tell of code reviewers yolo'ing it is that LLM's usually put the full filename path on the output, so if you see a file with the filename / path on the first line, thats prob a llm output
◧◩◪
8. throwu+Su[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-06 18:30:41
>>koakum+76
It strips the comments from the code or else it gets the hose again.
◧◩◪◨
9. ChadMo+UZ2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-07 16:36:26
>>shawab+Kd
https://github.com/x1xhlol/system-prompts-and-models-of-ai-t...
◧◩◪
10. ChadMo+5ax[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-19 19:23:43
>>koakum+76
I did not, but I'm curious if this would actually work.
[go to top]