zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. surgic+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-04-30 10:43:17
> No, he doesn't say that. He said that "maybe 20%, 30% of the code that is inside of our repos today and some of our projects are probably all written by software".

Ouch, this makes the headline not sinply inaccurate. It makes the headline false.

Having generated code is nothing new. Multiple companies I worked for in the past had a lot of automatically generated code for multiple things (from automatically generating tests for API contracts to automatically generating glue code between different modules/services).

Callong that "AI" borders on the level of malicious ignorance.

replies(1): >>cholan+Qa1
2. cholan+Qa1[view] [source] 2025-04-30 16:50:23
>>surgic+(OP)
>Ouch, this makes the headline not sinply inaccurate. It makes the headline false.

To be fair, Hanlon's razor suggests it was most likely written by someone who _would_ conflate software with AI. Though knowing the reward structures in '''journalism''', it could still be deliberate.

[go to top]