zlacker

Sounds like it reoccurs, but potentially the procedure is repeatable. I didn't see a frequency.

I wonder how many potential answers to such problems are out there, known to a few but not acted on by the masses.

>>cs02rm+(OP)
> In any case, the paper makes no comment as to whether the problem can be solved the same way a second time; obviously in principle it can, but finding all the new bypasses and sclerosing them might be difficult in practice.

Multiple surgeries is not sustainable. Too much uncertainty.

>>cactus+8g
> they then have the patient close off the bottom of the vein with finger pressure while they inject a sclerosing agent into the vein

It seems highly failure prone. If you don't block the flow are you going to stroke out?

>>cactus+8g
> Multiple surgeries is not sustainable. Too much uncertainty

I'm not sure where this is coming from. Multiple cardiac bypasses have a ton of uncertainty, but they are effective because efficacy is measured by quality of life * increased lifespan.

Multiple surgeries (the time it takes to regrow major veins from capillaries that aren't blocked off) to relatively non-lethal parts of the body seems very sustainable for a human lifespan after 60 or 55 or whatever.