zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
3 comments
1. wubrr+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2025-04-24 03:28:36
I am rebutting what the previous commenter said, sentence by sentence (almost), I don't know why that tells you that I'm not actually thinking about what they said though. Did I misunderstand or misrepresent something they said?
replies(2):
>>gpvos+dp
>>dcow+jL1
◧
2. gpvos+dp
[view]
[source]
2025-04-24 08:51:57
>>wubrr+(OP)
Going against someone is not the same as rebutting, the quality of the argument counts.
◧
3. dcow+jL1
[view]
[source]
2025-04-24 18:18:38
>>wubrr+(OP)
Because it’s easy to respond to one-off sentences. It’s harder to respond to the substantial argument they make.
replies(1):
>>wubrr+wl4
◧◩
4. wubrr+wl4
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2025-04-25 16:39:38
>>dcow+jL1
What substantial argument?
[go to top]