zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. Increa+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-04-23 22:46:29
Is your point weakened by the fact that there is not one freely available font to use commercially, but literally thousands?
replies(1): >>gkober+M
2. gkober+M[view] [source] 2025-04-23 22:52:02
>>Increa+(OP)
I guess it comes down to how you view the concept of "the medium is the message". Should the tone be set by the creator of the software / writer of the blog post / etc, or should the end user choose one typeface for everything (or have fine-grained control over everything they read and view?)
replies(1): >>tptace+fg
◧◩
3. tptace+fg[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-04-24 01:32:44
>>gkober+M
I don't think this makes much sense as an argument, because you can have it either way with the status quo. The question isn't whether creators can use typesetting expressively; they clearly can, with a degree of freedom and optionality that would have blown me away when I started font nerding back in the 1990s. The question is whether I should sympathize with designers who are irritated by the licensing terms for Gotham or Brandon Grotesque (or whomever is doing per-impression licensing these days). I do not, and I think I'm on solid ground.
[go to top]