zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. jasonl+(OP)[view] [source] 2012-08-12 18:42:34
> Do you want to be the product (facebook, twitter) or the customer (app.net)?

So, what explicit rights does the customer have over that which they get with Facebook or Twitter? Do I have voting rights for features? Is the business model solid? I mean, $500,000 is great and all, but that needs to last an entire year all while supporting future development. Sure, they can get new people on board, but what's their plan for that?

As for being the customer, it means little. As we've learned from experience, being a customer doesn't mean anything. You ask a question about being the product or being the customer as if being a customer actually gives you something, when in reality, it doesn't. I mean, in this case, you get a years worth of service. After that, nothing else is promised.

So, beyond the years worth of service, what do you really get? What are they promising? Because so far from what I see, the reality differs from the promise.

replies(3): >>mgkims+9 >>noblet+X >>tripzi+mH
2. mgkims+9[view] [source] 2012-08-12 18:45:34
>>jasonl+(OP)
Excellent point. I've been the customer of many services that still either close or get bought out by companies that I didn't want to do business with in the first place. I had no real 'rights' as a customer. Just because I'm not the product via ad views doesn't mean I (as part of a large customer base) don't make an excellent acquisition/takeover target. Will Caldwell sell out for $10 million? Probably not. Might he sell out for, say... $300 million? Possibly, and then I've yet again been turned in to a product for sale.
replies(1): >>jkbyc+69
3. noblet+X[view] [source] 2012-08-12 19:08:25
>>jasonl+(OP)
At the very least it means that I - as someone that values privacy - do not have to be in a necessarily antagonistic relationship with the company that provides the service.
◧◩
4. jkbyc+69[view] [source] [discussion] 2012-08-12 22:06:11
>>mgkims+9
That's one of the reasons why a distributed open-source version of the service might be the best option.
5. tripzi+mH[view] [source] 2012-08-13 14:02:24
>>jasonl+(OP)
> So, what explicit rights does the customer have over that which they get with Facebook or Twitter? Do I have voting rights for features?

No the features will automatically get better, because you pay for the quality and all the plebs won't get in.

[go to top]