zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. pas+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-04-17 09:29:30
And, for the full picture it's probably important to consider that the main claim of the book is based on very unreliable data/methodology. (Though note that it does not necessarily make the claim false! See [1])

https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2017/10/pi...

And then later similar claims about inequality were similarly made using bad methodology (data).

https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2023/12/th...

[1] "Indeed, in some cases, Sutch argues that it has risen more than Piketty claims. Sutch is rather a journeyman of economic history upset not about Piketty’s conclusions but about the methods Piketty used to reach those conclusions."

replies(1): >>skrebb+RM1
2. skrebb+RM1[view] [source] 2025-04-17 19:58:45
>>pas+(OP)
You misunderstand. I never read it. I simply liked the title, at least before I understood "Capital" that wasn't actually the title.
[go to top]