zlacker

Isn't the point of computers to have machines that improve on default human weaknesses, not just reproduce them at scale?

>>jimbok+(OP)
They've largely been complementary strengths, with less overlap. But human language is state-of-the-art, after hundreds of thousands of years of "development". It seems like reproducing SOTA (i.e. the current ongoing effort) is a good milestone for a computer algorithm as it gains language overlap with us.

>>jimbok+(OP)
Why would computers have just one “point”? They have been used for endless purposes and those uses will expand forever