zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. mixmas+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-04-14 01:11:55
I'd like a mobile OS where I can reuse my existing knowledge. Write software for it with Rust, Python, pipewire, systemd, Wayland, etc. Login with ssh.

No interest in Android apps or Windows (hah). (Though maybe I'll try Waydroid one of these days.)

I don't know anything about your distro, not the graphics stack or what the package manager is or even if there is one? Meanwhile my starlite tablet is awesome because it works just like my desktop Fedora or Mint, though I installed Phosh on it.

Security is nice, but not before there is even a single feasible device on the market. Librem is just barely limping along, and I mean barely with a five year old handset that was obsolete when it debuted.

If your kernel is so advanced it really should be upstreamed, so these other distros could use it and support new Pixels. Y'all working together with other mobile projects would be so much better than the current surveillance dystopia we are currently living in. Maybe it's hard, but it is incredibly important. I can help though have limits.

replies(1): >>yjftsj+x4
2. yjftsj+x4[view] [source] 2025-04-14 02:08:13
>>mixmas+(OP)
GrapheneOS is an Android/Linux distro, not GNU/Linux or musl+busybox/Linux; I suspect most of their security work isn't portable to the unixy Linux distros.
replies(1): >>mixmas+Qc
◧◩
3. mixmas+Qc[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-04-14 04:07:09
>>yjftsj+x4
I don't care much about security. I do care, but not as much as getting a modern phone working with Linux. It can be hardened once it is working.
replies(1): >>mixmas+cBb
◧◩◪
4. mixmas+cBb[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-04-17 20:18:56
>>mixmas+Qc
I read this whole thread again and it seems that the answer to the original question, is: the pixel drivers are maintained outside of the kernel tree by Google, and not these Graphene folks.

Sounds like I should complain to them instead. Yet they are known for being unreachable.

[go to top]