zlacker

> They are much better at the thing they are good at, and there are some new capabilities that are big, but they are still fundamentally next-token predictors.

I don't really get this. Are you saying autoregressive LLMs won't qualify as AGI, by definition? What about diffusion models, like Mercury? Does it really matter how inference is done if the result is the same?

>>Comple+(OP)
> Are you saying autoregressive LLMs won't qualify as AGI, by definition?

No, I am speculating that they will not reach capabilities that qualify them as AGI.

>>Vegeno+43
They will, we just need meatspace people to become dumber and more predictable. Making huge strides on that front, actually. (In no small part due to LLMs themselves, yeah.)