zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. db48x+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-03-27 12:54:48
You found a 1× engineer; the worst engineer that can keep the job.
replies(1): >>steveB+S
2. steveB+S[view] [source] 2025-03-27 13:00:28
>>db48x+(OP)
Over time we actually found him to be more of a -2x engineer, but thats another story

edit: reminded me of the old joke

A programmer gets sent to the store by his wife. His wife says, “Get a gallon of milk, and if they have eggs, get a dozen.”

The programmer returns home with 12 gallons of milk and says, “They had eggs.”

replies(4): >>monsie+j6 >>stavro+zi >>chrism+kJ >>glxxyz+n11
◧◩
3. monsie+j6[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-03-27 13:34:49
>>steveB+S
The fool, he should have gotten 13 gallons of milk
◧◩
4. stavro+zi[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-03-27 14:48:22
>>steveB+S
Ah, the "and" ruins that joke for me by signifying a separate clause. I think the original is:

> A programmer gets sent to the store by his wife. His wife says, “Get a gallon of milk. If they have eggs, get a dozen.”

◧◩
5. chrism+kJ[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-03-27 17:36:16
>>steveB+S
> more of a -2x engineer

You just needed to find another one like him, and bam, +4×.

(It is actually conceivable that two bad engineers could mostly cancel each other out, if they can occupy each other enough, but it’s not the most likely outcome.)

◧◩
6. glxxyz+n11[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-03-27 19:14:19
>>steveB+S
'Antiwork' - every hour they work uses up more than an hour of other engineers' time in questions, meetings, and later fixes.
replies(1): >>steveB+g91
◧◩◪
7. steveB+g91[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-03-27 20:00:17
>>glxxyz+n11
Correct - they do bad work quickly which requires 2x the time on repairs
[go to top]