zlacker

Ontario to Slap Export Tax on Electricity to U.S.

submitted by JumpCr+(OP) on 2025-03-04 15:59:39 | 32 points 32 comments
[view article] [source] [go to bottom]

NOTE: showing posts with links only show all posts
10. jaunty+nf[view] [source] 2025-03-04 17:05:34
>>JumpCr+(OP)
New England has been trying to build an 1.2MW ~150mi interconnect from Canada through Maine down to Massachusetts for many years now, and was hoping to wrap the project up this year. https://www.bangordailynews.com/2025/01/03/business/business...

Its been very controversial, especially because most of the land gows through Maine, cutting a line across it. Without doing much to improve Maine's grid. Mainer's passed a ballot initiative to halt the project, but courts ruled that Mainer's didn't have any right to halt the project.

So, the Central Maine Power (the power company) Corridor - officially called the New England Clean Energy Connect (NECEC) - was back on. With various rounds of tax increases for various states & federal grants. Total cost has gone from $1B to over $1.5b.

Conceptually seems like a good idea! It's so unfortunate that it's such a visible cut through & across the land. And now, with this madness, who knows what the future holds.

◧◩◪◨⬒
21. seanmc+f91[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-03-04 23:21:11
>>bitshi+k81
American steel companies just raised prices a week ago in anticipation of tariffs (not even passed tariffs), and the tariffs wouldn't even effect them. Everyone is going to want their share of higher pricing power, so expect domestic producers to follow higher import prices (well, its already happened).

If there was a lot of domestic suppliers and (more importantly) a lot of domestic competition, inflation might be avoided. But none of that exists, so expect consumers to pay for the tariffs directly and then more.

https://www.cato.org/blog/more-costly-steel-tariffs-horizon

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
24. bitshi+Xd1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-03-05 00:08:25
>>seanmc+4c1
In this comment chain, I have already clarified that by "inflation," I'm not referring to how an items price goes up after it becomes subject to a tariff. I'm referring to overall inflation in goods and services. You can see the rate of inflation from March of 2018 to the beginning of the COVID stimulus here: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CPIAUCSL
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
27. fredop+WE1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-03-05 04:25:32
>>bitshi+Ya1
I was able to find an article[0] showing job losses from Trump's first term tariffs but nothing concrete about inflation.

Despite not having concrete proof, I think there's a fairly plausible chain of events from tariffs to broader price increases. Trump's tariffs include a 10% tariff on Canadian oil and gas. If you're in a region that relies heavily on these things coming from Canada you're going to see prices go up on your monthly energy bills, fuel for your vehicle, etc. This also affects local businesses and directly increases their costs. Businesses can only absorb so much of an increase before they raise prices. Now you're able to buy even less between your increased monthly expenses and the higher prices in stores. This makes you go to your boss and ask for a raise just so you can keep up with what your purchasing power used to be. If your boss gives you that raise, the business sees their expenses go up again and may need to raise prices as a result.

In the scenario I described above, what step do you think won't happen that allows us to prevent higher energy prices from leading to inflation?

[0] https://carnegieendowment.org/china-financial-markets/2021/0...

[go to top]