zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. LeifCa+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-02-27 03:25:56
Probably orders of magnitude better than hard vacuum, though.
replies(3): >>eru+Y4 >>ikiris+D7 >>foxyv+RPd
2. eru+Y4[view] [source] 2025-02-27 04:17:15
>>LeifCa+(OP)
For conductive cooling, sure.

But for radiative cooling, vacuum with a clear view of the night sky is orders of magnitude better.

3. ikiris+D7[view] [source] 2025-02-27 04:52:23
>>LeifCa+(OP)
Their point is sure, you locally dump the heat. Where does it go then? There's not ground water to act as a sink so you're stuck with basically a big regolith insulator, and there's barely any atmosphere, so you're back to the black body of the ground with extra steps and a large local sink. That sink isn't infinite when you're talking even house scales, much less thermal scales of a large datacenter. Cooling works on earth because the atmosphere moves the heat.
4. foxyv+RPd[view] [source] 2025-03-03 17:18:43
>>LeifCa+(OP)
The regolith is 0.004W/m2K. Less than aerogel. Less than an open vacuum! Ouch!

Although the regolith is only 4-5 meters thick, so you could probably just go under it and see what the subsurface is like with regards to conductivity.

[go to top]