zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. pembro+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-02-23 21:07:59
Nothing more reassuring than a vague “we’re unlikely to go after you [if you stay on our good side.]”

It’s clear the UK wants big monopolistic tech platforms to fully dominate their local market so they only have a few throats to choke when trying to control the narrative…just like “the good old days” of centralized media.

I wouldn’t stand in the way of authoritarians if you value your freedom (or the ability to have a bank account).

The risk just isn't worth it. You write a blog post that rubs someone power-adjacent the wrong way and suddenly you're getting the classic "...nice little blog you have there...would be a shame to find something that could be interpreted as violating 1 of our 17 problem areas..."

replies(3): >>throwa+L4 >>HPsqua+j6 >>owisd+V6
2. throwa+L4[view] [source] 2025-02-23 21:47:49
>>pembro+(OP)
For my friends everything, for my enemies the law.

Uneven enforcement is the goal.

3. HPsqua+j6[view] [source] 2025-02-23 21:59:29
>>pembro+(OP)
Sovereign is he who makes the exception.
4. owisd+V6[view] [source] 2025-02-23 22:05:13
>>pembro+(OP)
Changing the code of practice is a years long statutory consultation process, they're not going to be able to change the rules to go after you on a whim.
replies(1): >>pembro+701
◧◩
5. pembro+701[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-02-24 08:31:30
>>owisd+V6
If you can’t find something to accuse from the SEVENTEEN “areas of focus” they’ve already designated in the law then I would argue you lack the creativity and thirst for power needed to climb the ranks as a politician.
[go to top]