zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. jquery+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-02-18 10:41:12
Efficiency isn't the number one goal of a democracy. You want pure efficiency, dictatorships are the way to go.

But for the most part, the things I expect the SF city government to do, get done. The roads are paved, the schools function, crime is kept in check, elections are held, permits are issued, inspections get done, etc. All to varying degrees of course. And the people get to change leadership if they feel things aren't going well (as they did in the last election).

replies(1): >>rahimn+fF
2. rahimn+fF[view] [source] 2025-02-18 15:34:58
>>jquery+(OP)
I didn't say I want pure efficiency.

I don't know what you mean about crime being kept in check. Right now there are several cars on my street with expired registration. Two of them have no license plates at all. I doubt they are insured. I have been the victim of crime in my home.

There are people openly selling illegal drugs on the street, with no fear of arrest or prosecution.

The schools spent $27k per student per year (i.e. $500k per classroom), and FEWER THAN HALF of students meet grade level standards in math and English.

It takes many many permits to open a restaurant, and many would-be restaurant owners give up part way through the ordeal. 'Permits are issued' doesn't indicate efficiency when the number of permits required is beyond what's reasonable.

The expectations we have of the government have to be related, to some extent, to the resources it takes from us.

If you spend $27k per student per year, yes I expect schools to run efficiently enough such that students graduate high school able to read and write.

replies(1): >>jquery+rT4
◧◩
3. jquery+rT4[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-02-19 20:11:44
>>rahimn+fF
You want better govt, that's great, so do I. I don't think randomly firing workers like it's a video game will accomplish that, however.
[go to top]