zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. _DeadF+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-02-18 00:05:23
US Police have qualified immunity, protecting them from their actions against the people, Singapore's Police don't. Who's sacrificing their morals in exchange for security?
replies(1): >>Aunche+2j
◧
2. Aunche+2j[view] [source] 2025-02-18 03:03:48
>>_DeadF+(OP)
What gives you the idea that police in Singapore don't have qualified immunity? It sounds like you're treating it as a buzzword. The police anywhere are not liable for the actions they take as part of their job.
replies(1): >>_DeadF+IA5
◧◩
3. _DeadF+IA5[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-02-19 19:02:22
>>Aunche+2j
The fact that police in Singapore only have qualified immunity when serving warrants/etc.

Qualified immunity was made up the United States Supreme Court in the 1960s. It is a buzzword.

[go to top]