zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. Agentu+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-02-17 17:09:43
You don’t have to even go to more authoritarian places to see the “solved” phenomenon. Many conservative states have harsher sentences or are more proactive in enforcement of petty crimes to “solve” undesirable/nonconformist behavior. Also solve is a funny word to describe dealing with people who ultimately dont want to conform to arbitrary restrictions on behavior.

Humans naturally evolved in a hunter gathering setting, yet certain governing “civilizing” forces had the audacity to eliminate that as possible lifestyle, and then label people who defy that restriction on lifestyle choice as problemmatic.

replies(2): >>cherio+3i >>PaulDa+2p
2. cherio+3i[view] [source] 2025-02-17 19:02:36
>>Agentu+(OP)
I don't see a pattern of conservative states solving drugs or violent crime.

https://www.ineteconomics.org/perspectives/blog/place-based-...

https://americaninequality.substack.com/p/violent-crime-and-...

replies(1): >>Agentu+Lm
◧◩
3. Agentu+Lm[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-02-17 19:31:47
>>cherio+3i
yeah the pattern is indiscernible because i was talking about petty crimes and related behavior (specifically homelessness) that have a lower per capita rate. violence isnt petty and i assume many drugs offenses arent considered petty. a quick google has validating statistics, although i cant find sources better than business insider at the moment. homeless population per capita by state and homelessness criminalization by state.
4. PaulDa+2p[view] [source] 2025-02-17 19:46:29
>>Agentu+(OP)
> Humans naturally evolved in a hunter gathering setting

Frequently asserted, but not really well substantiated. Plenty of new (or previously) ignored archeological and anthropological evidence that humans moved back and forth fairly seamlessly between hunting, gathering and cultivating in many differents part of the world.

You sound like the kind of person who would have somehow managed to read "The Dawn of Everything" by Graeber & Wengrow, but apparently either did not or for some reason disagree with one of their fundamental conclusions.

replies(1): >>Agentu+Ft
◧◩
5. Agentu+Ft[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-02-17 20:17:45
>>PaulDa+2p
yup, in the process of reading Wengrow
[go to top]