zlacker

> but noone is framing that situation as the problem.

I think yimbys are framing that situation as THE problem.

>>doomro+(OP)
I meant here, though I think there is also tendency in general

As a side note I think the state of current discourse has shown that anything other than concrete language presents too much opportunity to talk past each other. So I don't think talking about yimbys is specific enough (and its too tempting to strawman). Same for magas and libs, they are broad labels for a broad spectrum of people

>>trucke+T
So, what do we talk about then? Humans are pretty bad at multitasking so when speaking generally to a public you want to focus on one issue at a time.

>>johnny+5R
I'm saying be more specific not less