zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. WillPo+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-02-17 03:37:46
If they could have a job they wouldn't be homeless.
replies(2): >>amanap+24 >>genewi+MY
2. amanap+24[view] [source] 2025-02-17 04:19:06
>>WillPo+(OP)
My understanding is that there are plenty of homeless folks with jobs.
replies(1): >>bombca+w61
3. genewi+MY[view] [source] 2025-02-17 13:09:54
>>WillPo+(OP)
Why would a job automatically mean housing? This is America, a job only means enough money for housing in some markets.
◧◩
4. bombca+w61[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-02-17 14:00:39
>>amanap+24
Identifying and assisting these people first would seem to be the thing to do.

But reducing those homeless to 0% would likely not move the needle at all on the “problematic homeless” - the type everyone complains about.

Nobody cares about Steve Wallis sleeping in a bush.

[go to top]