zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. aprilt+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-02-17 02:22:27
This isn't true btw. In San Francisco the constant homeless and drug and crime issues have led to voting changes.
replies(1): >>Michae+s6
2. Michae+s6[view] [source] 2025-02-17 03:16:22
>>aprilt+(OP)
Since when did changes in one electoral cycle automatically equate to changes in long term voting behaviour?

e.g. Swing states are a well known concept, so it’s unclear how you could confuse that.

It has to be credibly sustained and durable for a few cycles, at the very least.

replies(1): >>aprilt+jv
◧◩
3. aprilt+jv[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-02-17 07:37:01
>>Michae+s6
It has been durable for a few cycles. There was the Boudin recall and now the recent election
replies(1): >>Michae+Pt1
◧◩◪
4. Michae+Pt1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-02-17 15:32:20
>>aprilt+jv
Can you provide sources for the relevant electoral districts…?

At the very least, whatever has been imagined hasn’t translated into a ground reality expected by the parent. So I doubt it’s true.

[go to top]