zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. ethbr1+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-01-22 17:05:25
If they were smart, they'd build MS Fabric for health data, especially if they control a big chunk of the EHR.

Providing a turnkey HIPAA-compliant but modern health dataverse would be huge.

replies(1): >>breadw+M2
2. breadw+M2[view] [source] 2025-01-22 17:17:43
>>ethbr1+(OP)
That already exists: https://www.truveta.com/
replies(1): >>ethbr1+jf
◧◩
3. ethbr1+jf[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-22 18:22:49
>>breadw+M2
That looks like a different use case.

The Snowflake-for-health is more about opening EHR data for operational use by providers and facilities.

Versus being locked into respective EHR platforms.

If Oracle provided a compelling data suite (a la MS) within their own cloud ecosystem, they'd have less reason to restrict it at the EHR level (as they'd have lock-in at the platform level), which would help them compete against Epic (who can't pivot to openness in the same way, without risking their primary product).

replies(1): >>breadw+ug
◧◩◪
4. breadw+ug[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-22 18:30:19
>>ethbr1+jf
I think you mean PostgreSQL for EHR data. MS Fabric and Snowflake are analytical databases, not operational. Patient privacy requirements (and HIPAA law) is a blocker for having an open operational database for EHR.
[go to top]