zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. IIsi50+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-01-22 14:49:44
Doesn't "dismissed with prejudice" usually mean something like "the evidence presented for the charge is so lacking that the charge should never have been brought in the first place"?
replies(2): >>smeege+F >>ArnoVW+et
2. smeege+F[view] [source] 2025-01-22 14:52:53
>>IIsi50+(OP)
see my edit. i am a full supporter of letting adults have freedom to buy and use whatever drugs they want but i also think murdering and torturing people should not be allowed
3. ArnoVW+et[view] [source] 2025-01-22 17:23:40
>>IIsi50+(OP)
Not a lawyer but I believe that “with prejudice” means that the judge denies appeals (so yes generally it means the case is considered frivolous)
[go to top]