zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. Neverm+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-01-22 14:44:16
If an LLM clears up a misunderstanding, I am having trouble seeing that as a bad thing.

Maybe in 10 years we can blame poor reading comprehension on having a decade of computers reading for us. But it’s a bit early for that.

replies(2): >>firest+Lf >>dontli+Vt
2. firest+Lf[view] [source] 2025-01-22 16:15:39
>>Neverm+(OP)
Who will think if LLM is doing all the thinking?
3. dontli+Vt[view] [source] 2025-01-22 17:23:29
>>Neverm+(OP)
The problem is that people already have piss-poor reading comprehension. Relying LLMs to help them is going to make it worse than it already is.
replies(1): >>JohnMa+4x
◧◩
4. JohnMa+4x[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-22 17:41:19
>>dontli+Vt
I wonder what is going on? I’ve noticed this getting worse for a long time to the point I’m not sure it’s my imagination anymore. I usually like to lambast whole word reading as a complete failure in the american school system that contributes to this, but I think it’s likely something else. Shorter attention spans?
replies(1): >>Neverm+jZ
◧◩◪
5. Neverm+jZ[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-22 20:30:11
>>JohnMa+4x
Long form reading is dying.

We have a multitude of immediate distractions now.

Books build richer worlds & ideas. But without learning to love books very early in life, which takes a lot of uninterrupted time, they don’t come naturally to most.

I used to read a few books a week, virtually every week. Sometimes two or three in a long day and some night. I still read a lot daily, interesting and useful things in short form. But finding time to read books seems to have become more difficult.

[go to top]