zlacker

Plus he didn't even sell the drugs. He created a technology platform that facilitates it. I can think of many other communications platforms that also do this, for example Google, email, Verizon, etc.

>>xyzzy9+(OP)
So by your logic, a drug kingpin who doesn't actually handle the drug-selling transaction should not be liable for anything, even though the money rolls up to them?

Ross directly profited from the sale of those drugs. So, yes, he was "selling the drugs".

>>sbarre+n4
Google and Meta also profit from selling ads to the people who use it to trade drugs. All I'm saying is there's a rough equivalence. Perhaps the Silk Road platform should be banned but he was not a drug dealer himself. Creating a communications platform is not the same thing as being a drug dealer.

>>xyzzy9+W4
He created/operated a platform with the primary purpose of facilitating the sale of drugs. He profited from those transactions. That makes him a drug dealer.

Comparing Meta and Google to Silk Road is a bad faith argument. You might as well compare Silk Road to the phone network at that point.

>>xyzzy9+(OP)
I’m generally lasseiz-faire when it comes to most drugs, although I do think some drugs like opioids are rather objectively a cancer to society and anybody in that pipeline needs to be punished.

So. Comparisons to Google, Verizon, etc?

While his actions aren’t equivalent to a “direct” old-fashioned drug dealer selling fentanyl, they’re clearly also not equivalent to providers like Google or Verizon.

They provide truly general purpose communications networks. Common carriers. That’s different from a marketplace explicitly designed to facilitate a particular thing like selling drugs.

I mean, you can upload non-porn videos to PornHub, or attempt to met platonic knitting circle buddies on there. But let’s not sit around and pretend the entire operation isn’t designed around the explicit purpose of selling porn.

>>sbarre+o6
There were many other items and services sold on Silk Road, it wasn’t just drugs.

>>JohnBo+T7
It wasn’t designed for just drugs. There were many different categories.

>>xyzzy9+0l
Different categories, yes. But mostly drugs.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gh5_2YgWoAABY-O?format=jpg&name=...

>>xyzzy9+tb
According to wikipedia [1], 70% of the products sold on silk road were drugs

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silk_Road_(marketplace). wikipedia uses as reference https://web.archive.org/web/20160407165324/http://gawker.com... and https://web.archive.org/web/20131012012106/http://www.thegua...

plus, at least ebay, amazon, big tech comply or at least sometimes comply with the law banning some products which can't be sold or advertised

>>xyzzy9+0l
There was a category for drugs. And specific subcategories for different specific kinds of drugs.

Unlike, say, the phone network or your neighborhood street corner it was pretty unambiguously designed to sell drugs (and more)

Apart from any sort of judgement we might want to make, facts are facts and Silk Road was factually designed to sell drugs.

You don't get to participate in the discussion until you acknowledge basic reality.