zlacker

[parent] [thread] 7 comments
1. eckmLJ+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-01-22 13:23:55
No, silk road did not sell weapons. There was legal content like pornography and other media on there, but Ulbricht was an idealist and excluded material with "intent to harm".
replies(2): >>kerkes+a1 >>Novemb+F2
2. kerkes+a1[view] [source] 2025-01-22 13:31:09
>>eckmLJ+(OP)
Notably, as Ullbricht predicted, the Silk Road was immediately replaced by sites which did not have such ideals, and openly sold weapons and illegal pornography.
replies(1): >>consp+95
3. Novemb+F2[view] [source] 2025-01-22 13:40:45
>>eckmLJ+(OP)
So all the people who got convicted for selling firearms on Silk Road, how'd that happen then?
replies(2): >>kerkes+44 >>red-ir+1a
◧◩
4. kerkes+44[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-22 13:48:08
>>Novemb+F2
It didn't happen.

Ctrl-F for "Products" on this page[1] and stop making shit up.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silk_Road_(marketplace)

replies(1): >>Algent+u9
◧◩
5. consp+95[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-22 13:56:02
>>kerkes+a1
They were there already and shutting down the silk road changed nothing in that perspective.
◧◩◪
6. Algent+u9[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-22 14:20:42
>>kerkes+44
Interesting and surprising they really had rules, thanks for the clarification. I'm ashamed to say I opened this page and read it wrong the first time by skipping the first sentence.
replies(1): >>busymo+wd
◧◩
7. red-ir+1a[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-22 14:23:06
>>Novemb+F2
don't conflate Silk Road == all Darknet Markets

plus in North America you don't really need a darknet market to get a gun illegally. US FedGov ain't gonna get to involved in illegal gun sales in Europe.

◧◩◪◨
8. busymo+wd[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-22 14:46:47
>>Algent+u9
You might be interested in my comment about Carnegie Mellon University's researchers findings on what Silk Road sold/didn't sell/what was popular.
[go to top]