zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
4 comments
1. dbspin+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2025-01-22 12:42:55
[flagged]
replies(2):
>>haswel+Bu
>>jdhzzz+ox
◧
2. haswel+Bu
[view]
[source]
2025-01-22 15:52:30
>>dbspin+(OP)
What are you suggesting here? That the earlier bitcoin seizure somehow led to this pardon? I’m not following.
replies(1):
>>dbspin+yc1
◧
3. jdhzzz+ox
[view]
[source]
2025-01-22 16:11:13
>>dbspin+(OP)
Well an upper bound anyway. Maybe, "The Art of the Deal" could have gotten it a lot closer to $1.2 B.
◧◩
4. dbspin+yc1
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2025-01-22 19:53:36
>>haswel+Bu
No you're right. I'm sure Trump released him as a deeply principled and selfless act.
replies(1):
>>haswel+8d1
◧◩◪
5. haswel+8d1
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2025-01-22 19:57:09
>>dbspin+yc1
I’m not suggesting that. I’m trying to understand what benefit you believe Trump received out of this whole scenario, and specifically how the handling of the bitcoin played a role.
[go to top]