zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. antiso+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-01-22 12:36:27
> because the legal/judicial system won’t have enough resources to prosecute them?

If your legal system doesn't have enough resources to prosecute 90% of people who are committing crimes.................................

.......................................... then maybe the state should.............................................

.................... wait for it...................................

.....................................give the legal system more resources.

(I know right, it's mindblowing, revolutionary, difficult-to-conceive stuff - I can see why nobody has thought of it before)

replies(1): >>wqaatw+Fy2
2. wqaatw+Fy2[view] [source] 2025-01-23 08:28:59
>>antiso+(OP)
So make the system (that’s already inefficient) several times more inefficient and then increase funding by a magnitude or two? Certainly seems like a reasonable option.

I bet all problems could be solved using this approach. What could go wrong..

replies(1): >>antiso+ga5
◧◩
3. antiso+ga5[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-24 10:43:28
>>wqaatw+Fy2
Perhaps.

I was thinking more along the lines of taking a system that isn't just or fair, and making it more just and fair.

See, I wasn't really concerned very much by profitability and efficiency, more about what is good and right.

Silly me, I guess.

[go to top]