zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. insane+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-01-22 06:25:40
yes, unless you're a big enough finance scammer that you stole from really rich people (most scammers who steal millions don't get it from the very rich)
replies(1): >>mattma+K01
2. mattma+K01[view] [source] 2025-01-22 15:06:28
>>insane+(OP)
People have gone to jail for longer for selling weed, I think the argument that finacial crimes get you longer prison sentences is absurd.
replies(1): >>insane+4u1
◧◩
3. insane+4u1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-22 17:42:10
>>mattma+K01
I didn't say financial crimes in general, I specifically said financial crimes on a level that impact a large number of very rich people.
replies(1): >>mattma+LT1
◧◩◪
4. mattma+LT1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-22 20:14:37
>>insane+4u1
But even then the times aren't longer than someone who gets caught with a 100 grams of coke. Skilling got 12 years for a financial fraud so heinous the whole system was re-regulated. You get that for selling crack on the corner.
replies(1): >>insane+wv2
◧◩◪◨
5. insane+wv2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-23 00:57:14
>>mattma+LT1
There’s no question that the “war on drugs” sentencing is ridiculously out of proportion with the actual harm done, especially if you’re not white or upper class. I was making a comparison between types of financial crimes.
replies(1): >>mattma+Nz3
◧◩◪◨⬒
6. mattma+Nz3[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-23 12:47:00
>>insane+wv2
I mean if you’re saying bigger financial crimes get larger than smaller ones, ok?
[go to top]