zlacker

> The rule of law is important,

The rule of law says innocent until proven guilty.

The reason they didn't go after him for murder for hire allegations isn't because they felt bad for him or that they didn't want to waste tax payer's money.

The reason they didn't go after him for 'murder for hire' was that they knew there was no merit in it.

This is self evident.

>>lothar+(OP)
They did go after him for "murder for hire"; the murders were part of his conspiracy predicates, and evidence for them was introduced. This stuff about him not being taken all the way through a case charged on murder-for-hire, after receiving a life sentence in a case where those murders were part of the case, is just message board jazz hands.

>>tptace+w1
>case where those murders were part of the case, is just message board jazz hands.

you're trying to look like you don't understand or aren't aware that jury didn't convict him of murder-for-hire.

He chose a trial by jury, not by a judge. Nevertheless the judge herself decided that he is guilty of the murder-for-hire, and additionally the judge used significantly lower standard than required for conviction.

>>trhway+n5
That's not what happened at all. You can just read the filings on PACER; I'm sure they're all free on Courtlistener by now.