zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. ekianj+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-01-22 02:30:26
> Just because the charge was dropped doesn't mean he's innocent of it.

If you had a trial and they can't prove that, then yes it means you are innocent of this charge in the eyes of the law

replies(1): >>ktalle+N
2. ktalle+N[view] [source] 2025-01-22 02:35:55
>>ekianj+(OP)
Ah that's not strictly true. I believe Scotland is the only place in the world I am aware of where there is Innocent, unproven, and Guilty verdicts. I believe in reality a not guilty verdict is, we didn't have the evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt this person committed the crime. Finding someone not guilty is a legal term. Considering whether someone is innocent or not is more of a moral/factual term.
replies(1): >>megapo+2y
◧◩
3. megapo+2y[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-22 08:07:50
>>ktalle+N
> I believe in reality a not guilty verdict is, we didn't have the evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt this person committed the crime.

That’s a description of the Scottish “not proven” verdict, not a “not guilty” verdict.

replies(2): >>wizzwi+5X >>ktalle+r31
◧◩◪
4. wizzwi+5X[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-22 12:04:45
>>megapo+2y
That's also a description of the "not guilty" verdict. Guilty is "beyond a reasonable doubt", and "not guilty" is those circumstances that are not Guilty.
◧◩◪
5. ktalle+r31[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-22 12:51:42
>>megapo+2y
Not proven in Scotland and not guilty in almost every other country are the equivalent. Innocent is the outlier verdict in Scotland that the rest of the world doesn't have.
[go to top]