zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. DannyB+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-01-22 01:29:47
To be fair - he was not pardoned for that, he could still be charged for it. He was only pardoned for crimes related to drugs.
replies(1): >>johnne+11
2. johnne+11[view] [source] 2025-01-22 01:35:00
>>DannyB+(OP)
do you know that is actually the case ? i've been trying to find the text of the pardon and haven't been able to yet. can only find Trump's description of it as "full and unconditional"

edit: i see your other comment with the context

replies(1): >>DannyB+56
◧◩
3. DannyB+56[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-22 02:08:07
>>johnne+11
They unfortunately have not released the text yet.

It should eventually pop up here: https://www.justice.gov/pardon/clemency-recipients

(among other places)

replies(1): >>DannyB+eP1
◧◩◪
4. DannyB+eP1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-22 16:38:59
>>DannyB+56
It is now there, see - https://www.justice.gov/pardon/media/1386096/dl

He was not pardoned for any crimes not charged, and therefore could still be charged.

replies(1): >>tptace+U63
◧◩◪◨
5. tptace+U63[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-23 01:26:39
>>DannyB+eP1
Does this mean California could go after Ulbricht for solicitation on the murder scheme, like, tomorrow?
[go to top]