zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. notyou+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-01-22 01:13:47
What the future holds for someone who was pardoned is likely decided based on very different rationalization compared to how one acts while serving a lifetime prison sentence.
replies(1): >>ktalle+x
2. ktalle+x[view] [source] 2025-01-22 01:16:23
>>notyou+(OP)
Whilst I understand your point of view that the change in circumstances can change how someone decides to act, I don't believe there is much history to show someone who gained a surprising second chance outside of prison has gone back to their previous life.
replies(2): >>bdhcui+w5 >>bb88+39
◧◩
3. bdhcui+w5[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-22 01:47:39
>>ktalle+x
> I don't believe there is much history to show someone who gained a surprising second chance outside of prison has gone back to their previous life.

Didnt have to look far, from dec 9:

https://lawandcrime.com/crime/exonerated-man-heading-back-to...

replies(1): >>ktalle+j7
◧◩◪
4. ktalle+j7[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-22 01:59:00
>>bdhcui+w5
Of course, there will be an outlier. I didn't state no history. One person doing wrong after being released shouldn't mean no one gets released.
replies(1): >>bb88+C8
◧◩◪◨
5. bb88+C8[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-22 02:07:47
>>ktalle+j7
No but recidivism should be factored into such a decision.
◧◩
6. bb88+39[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-22 02:10:33
>>ktalle+x
It's vindication of political violence that's the problem. If political violence is sanctioned, then there is no law.
[go to top]