zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. kyleye+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-01-22 00:38:07
The seven offenses in question: distributing narcotics, distributing narcotics by means of the Internet, conspiring to distribute narcotics, engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise, conspiring to commit computer hacking, conspiring to traffic in false identity documents, and conspiring to commit money laundering
replies(1): >>ty6853+J5
2. ty6853+J5[view] [source] 2025-01-22 01:23:46
>>kyleye+(OP)
A judge bypassed the jury and prosecutor and sentenced him as if he hired hit men and admitted doing so. The sentence upgrade was based on a preponderance of evidence, whereas they would have had to proven beyond a reasonable doubt had he been charged.
replies(1): >>FireBe+c9
◧◩
3. FireBe+c9[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-22 01:46:00
>>ty6853+J5
Framing this as judicial activism is false. Many sentencing arrangements include - with the agreement of the defendant (since it is their rights in this case) - to have other related activities factored in exactly this manner.

It happens all the time in pleas and diversion agreements, so don’t frame it as a reckless lone judge going off the reservation.

[go to top]