zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
6 comments
1. ameliu+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2025-01-21 23:43:36
Not sure about that. ChatGPT is much greater than Google Search ever was, and that wasn't a bubble.
replies(2):
>>stacks+G1
>>dwnw+B2
◧
2. stacks+G1
[view]
[source]
2025-01-21 23:53:15
>>ameliu+(OP)
ChatGPT may be better than Google Search in content but at end of day, you have to make money and last report I saw, ChatGPT is burning through money at prestigious rate.
replies(2):
>>scarmi+Wg
>>Davidz+yO
◧
3. dwnw+B2
[view]
[source]
2025-01-21 23:59:42
>>ameliu+(OP)
Not sure about that.
◧◩
4. scarmi+Wg
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2025-01-22 01:43:13
>>stacks+G1
Training, yes, but they recoup inference costs through subscriptions.
replies(2):
>>dartos+bh
>>Davidz+FO
◧◩◪
5. dartos+bh
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2025-01-22 01:45:12
>>scarmi+Wg
Didn’t Altman say they’re losing money on the $200 subscription tier?
Inference isn’t cheap either.
◧◩
6. Davidz+yO
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2025-01-22 06:50:06
>>stacks+G1
reminds me of a scene from the Matrix. "Tell me Mr. Anderson, what use is a phone call when you can't speak"
◧◩◪
7. Davidz+FO
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2025-01-22 06:51:26
>>scarmi+Wg
subscriptions are just to sustain them until the endgame
[go to top]