zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. rcpt+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-01-21 23:43:01
Yeah but the linked article makes it seem like the current, one-day-old, administration is responsible for the whole thing.
replies(2): >>janals+T2 >>HarHar+G3
◧
2. janals+T2[view] [source] 2025-01-22 00:01:09
>>rcpt+(OP)
The article also mentions that this all started last year.
◧
3. HarHar+G3[view] [source] 2025-01-22 00:06:04
>>rcpt+(OP)
Trump just tore up Biden's AI safety bill, so this is OpenAI's thank-you - let Trump take some credit
replies(1): >>HarHar+Vc
◧◩
4. HarHar+Vc[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-22 01:17:37
>>HarHar+G3
Note sure if the downvoters realize that Trump did in fact just tear up Biden's AI safety bill/order.

https://www.reuters.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/t...

replies(2): >>spacec+GO1 >>ericjm+wU1
◧◩◪
5. spacec+GO1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-22 15:15:12
>>HarHar+Vc
It's even mentioned in the article!

> Still, the regulatory outlook for AI remains somewhat uncertain as Trump on Monday overturned the 2023 order signed by then-President Joe Biden to create safety standards and watermarking of AI-generated content, among other goals, in hopes of putting guardrails on the technology’s possible risks to national security and economic well-being.

◧◩◪
6. ericjm+wU1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-22 15:49:52
>>HarHar+Vc
He delayed enforcement of it for 75 days while they take time to interpret the law.
[go to top]