zlacker

[parent] [thread] 7 comments
1. segasa+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-01-21 22:47:39
How much capacity does solar and wind add compared to nuclear, per square foot of land used? Also I thought the new administration was placing a ban on new renewable installations.
replies(4): >>hooli_+x >>itisha+i1 >>bryanl+12 >>malfis+g6
2. hooli_+x[view] [source] 2025-01-21 22:50:33
>>segasa+(OP)
Isn't there enough space in Texas? There are only 114 people per square mile. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas
3. itisha+i1[view] [source] 2025-01-21 22:54:46
>>segasa+(OP)
Why does it matter? Is land at a premium in Texas?
replies(1): >>zekrio+SN
4. bryanl+12[view] [source] 2025-01-21 22:58:04
>>segasa+(OP)
The ban is on offshore wind and for government loans for renewables. Won't really affect Texas much, it's Massachusetts that'll have to deal with more expensive energy.
replies(1): >>energy+Oc
5. malfis+g6[view] [source] 2025-01-21 23:23:05
>>segasa+(OP)
Why is that a useful metric? There is a lot of land.
replies(1): >>zekrio+BN
◧◩
6. energy+Oc[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-22 00:05:58
>>bryanl+12
Does anyone know how the ban on onshore will work. Is it on federal lands only? If so, how big of a deal is that?

I read this but it lacks information: https://apnews.com/article/wind-energy-offshore-turbines-tru...

◧◩
7. zekrio+BN[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-22 05:03:03
>>malfis+g6
Because the commenter is a pro-nuclear who thinks nucler will solve all of short-term demand problems.
◧◩
8. zekrio+SN[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-22 05:05:23
>>itisha+i1
It doesn’t.
[go to top]