zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. Rodeoc+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-01-21 09:49:31
You cannot tech your way out of this.
replies(2): >>ndsipa+s5 >>zester+h8
2. ndsipa+s5[view] [source] 2025-01-21 10:33:22
>>Rodeoc+(OP)
No, but it seems like we'll need ways to co-ordinate resistance against the oppressors.
3. zester+h8[view] [source] 2025-01-21 10:54:25
>>Rodeoc+(OP)
Decentralisation is a socio-political solution, not a technical solution. It directly addresses the problem of media ownership and proliferation.
replies(1): >>janice+xs
◧◩
4. janice+xs[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-21 13:36:53
>>zester+h8
It's a limited solution at best. You can't win a tech arms race with the very people who control the core infrastructure, write the laws and run the police. Just ask the pro-Democracy protestors in Hong Kong.
replies(2): >>Jgoure+iT >>jaunty+tf1
◧◩◪
5. Jgoure+iT[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-21 16:01:18
>>janice+xs
You are so right!!!! Everyone is like Elon is the richest man! Bezos is the richest! The richest government scares the NSA, not these poor rich people.
◧◩◪
6. jaunty+tf1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-21 17:40:52
>>janice+xs
That wasn't a tech arms race, that was military & police domination.

We have a heavily contested information space, & so far we are still not an authoritarian state. It seems defeatist I'm extremely to say it's not worth trying to build a better less manipulable less privately controlled information space. It seems obvious that there's still time & patriotic as hell - fully committed to democracy & people, over large institutions & powers.

[go to top]