zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
2 comments
1. techfe+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2025-01-14 12:57:22
Can someone steelman (or just represent) the argument of why Bud Light supporting Dylan Mulvaney is wokeness and not classical liberalism/free speech?
replies(2):
>>hhh111+bZ
>>blasor+SO1
◧
2. hhh111+bZ
[view]
[source]
2025-01-14 17:22:18
>>techfe+(OP)
That ad campaign was enabled by the 1st amendment but not motivated by it. You’re conflating why they wanted to do it with why they could do it
◧
3. blasor+SO1
[view]
[source]
2025-01-14 20:47:27
>>techfe+(OP)
https://thecritic.co.uk/dylan-mulvaney-did-not-share-our-gir...
This article explains why.
[go to top]