zlacker

Much like "woke" isn't really a single coherent entity, neither is "antiwoke". E.g. Bill Maher is notoriously anti-woke, but I haven't heard him demanding language policing. The part of it that does is the same people who have always done it, i.e. social conservatives - for whom it is literally a part of their platform and has always been that.

>>int_19+(OP)
Hard not to interpret this:

"Consumers have emphatically rejected brands that ventured too far into wokeness. The Bud Light brand may have been permanently damaged by it."

as an endorsement of the social conservative elements of "antiwoke".

>>int_19+(OP)
> We have embraced freedom. We have maintained law and order. We have protected the rights of parents. We have respected our taxpayers, and we reject woke ideology. We fight the woke in the legislature. We fight the woke in the schools. We fight the woke in the corporations. We will never, ever surrender to the woke mob. Florida is where woke goes to die.

Is that not anti-woke?

>>deepsq+Vy
No, it isn't. It's just a sentiment that shitty toxic tribalism masquerading as social justice (and whatever the equivalent is for the political right) has no place in legislature/schools/corporations.

It's actively detrimental to good policy/education/business if only by the virtue of drowning out people who are just going about their day to day responsibilities.

>>deepsq+Vy
Sure. It's also a good example of a social and cultural conservative.