zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. bpt3+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-01-13 20:27:22
While your example is interesting, I would at least give those people some credit for taking the action they could (even if it is largely pointless as you said).

I think a better analogy is people who would criticize other heterosexual couples for getting married when homosexual couples could not, as it is both pointless and needlessly antagonistic.

replies(1): >>UltraS+94
2. UltraS+94[view] [source] 2025-01-13 20:41:42
>>bpt3+(OP)
Except the goal of this kind of behavior is not actual change but proving to the world you are "morally superior" by your chosen system of morality.
replies(1): >>moskie+if
◧◩
3. moskie+if[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-13 21:25:46
>>UltraS+94
Would you say the same about people joining picket lines and marches? Any sort of peaceful protest?

Also, you're projecting. You don't (and can't) know what a person's true goals are. Framing these actions as them communicating they are morally superior to someone (you?) is a thought in that other person's head, not the protestors. Maybe these straight people truly believe this form of protest (not getting married) will bring attention to a cause and maybe change some people's minds. Did it? Who knows. But good on them for at least trying.

[go to top]