zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. blactu+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-01-13 19:29:22
I can. Before he owned twitter, if someone called me the n-word or other racial slurs, action was taken. Now when that happens and I report it, they reply to tell me no rules were broken
replies(1): >>vessen+G2
2. vessen+G2[view] [source] 2025-01-13 19:37:39
>>blactu+(OP)
I'm sorry to hear you're called slurs. They seem endemic for my kid as well as soon as you move out of ultra progressive areas; as a white parent of a black kid, it's disheartening and eye opening to find out just how racist some families are, and how immensely wide spread it is.

That said, I don't think this qualifies as newly minted removal of speech. It is the allowance of speech that was formerly removed.

replies(1): >>blactu+83
◧◩
3. blactu+83[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-13 19:39:37
>>vessen+G2
He does not allow the use of the word cisgender, in any context, for one
replies(2): >>dragon+J4 >>vessen+A8
◧◩◪
4. dragon+J4[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-13 19:44:46
>>blactu+83
This is so vigorous that the standalone term "cis", is frequently targeted for visibility reduction even when used outside of the context of gender.
◧◩◪
5. vessen+A8[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-13 19:58:52
>>blactu+83
Yep, this was mentioned elsewhere in this thread, and it's the only example I've heard of. Like I said elsewhere, seems performative to me.
[go to top]