zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. qqqult+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-01-13 19:29:04
The imitation rule states that it's perfectly fine to run parody accounts as long as you clearly state that it's a parody. There are a ton of accounts named Elon Musk Parody, Biden Parody and similar

Without it every post of a famous person was botted with 100 accounts with identical display name, pfp that tried to promote scams like with YouTube comments

replies(2): >>ColdTa+t1 >>lern_t+r5
2. ColdTa+t1[view] [source] 2025-01-13 19:33:33
>>qqqult+(OP)
The user says they were banned within hours of Elon taking over Twitter. New Parody rules did not come into affect until November 2022.
replies(1): >>qqqult+H5
3. lern_t+r5[view] [source] 2025-01-13 19:46:59
>>qqqult+(OP)
Here's an account that calls itself Michelle Obama (not even Michelle's Obama) after the parody rule went into effect (unlike Elon's Musk). It doesn't label itself a parody. It's still there. https://x.com/TaxpayerEnrique
◧◩
4. qqqult+H5[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-13 19:47:43
>>ColdTa+t1
I replied to your comment about what constitutes imitation and why that rule exists. Neither of us have any idea about the details of that particular ban
replies(1): >>ColdTa+V6
◧◩◪
5. ColdTa+V6[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-13 19:52:07
>>qqqult+H5
I know why the rule exist. Getting banned for a rule that did not exist at the time is an overreach from a self-proclaimed free speech absolutist.
[go to top]