zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. vlovic+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-01-12 23:56:42
Wtf is this comment in relation to? Certainly not the article which is about a strictly technical issue or how to deploy time smearing for the first time.
replies(2): >>schoen+4 >>aikina+N3
2. schoen+4[view] [source] 2025-01-12 23:57:14
>>vlovic+(OP)
It's a reference to the very last paragraph of the article.
replies(1): >>llm_tr+d
◧◩
3. llm_tr+d[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-12 23:58:46
>>schoen+4
And the title.
replies(1): >>jacobl+Mt
4. aikina+N3[view] [source] 2025-01-13 00:29:40
>>vlovic+(OP)
Read to the end. The time smearing article was just a clever ruse to set up her political jab.
replies(1): >>rcarmo+iU
◧◩◪
5. jacobl+Mt[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-13 04:58:09
>>llm_tr+d
Not really? The title is a reference to the article's topic of systematically manipulating time standards (which results in the time for the entire company getting slowly sent "into the past") for the purpose of avoiding complexities like leap seconds, etc.
◧◩
6. rcarmo+iU[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-13 10:04:33
>>aikina+N3
The fact that she has the experience (and the stories) to set it up in the first place more than makes up for it, IMHO.
[go to top]