zlacker

Even if no attribution etc is your personal policy that’s not everyone else’s.

That's up to the courts. As usual, we will all lose if the copyright maximalists win.

>>Camper+(OP)
Last I checked creators of a work held copyright for it and that hasn’t changed. So no, this is not a new legal question

>>liontw+LK
That's not how copyright law works.

That's not how anything works.

>>Camper+JL
Ok. Thanks for your contribution to the discussion.

>>Camper+(OP)
To me it looks like individual creators are the ones most likely to lose.

I was watching an interview with John Warnock (one of the founders of Adobe) and he was proud of the fact that the US went from having 25,000 graphic designers to 2,500,000 largely thanks to software his company created.

I do wonder if we are on the verge of reversing that shift.

>>tonyed+AI1
The question you should be asking is if we need 2,500,000 graphic designers. Humans have a higher purpose than doing a robot's job.

>>Camper+d82
Humans have a higher purpose than doing whatever job robots can't.

>>tonyed+js3
Whatever that purpose is, you're not going to achieve it while doing a job that robots can.

>>Camper+Va4
Which is the point I was making in the first place.