zlacker

[parent] [thread] 7 comments
1. Erikun+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-12-28 12:18:28
‘[…]Carlsen said: “I said I’ll change tomorrow … but they said you have to change now it became a matter of principle for me so here we are. […]’

I can’t even figure out what the principle was.

replies(1): >>adastr+72
2. adastr+72[view] [source] 2024-12-28 12:40:46
>>Erikun+(OP)
They fined/censored him. He accepted the consequence and said "ok, I'll change as soon as I'm back at my hotel." They then hit him with a second infraction, for still being out of dress code.

I'm not a chess dress code rules lawyer, but I think the principle here is that the judge was power tripping and hit him twice for a single dress code violation.

replies(1): >>Pokemo+F8
◧◩
3. Pokemo+F8[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-12-28 13:54:29
>>adastr+72
I'm sorry but now we surely have lost the meaning of the word censored. Now it means not getting to play chess in a tournament?
replies(2): >>chucks+8a >>astura+Ha
◧◩◪
4. chucks+8a[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-12-28 14:10:44
>>Pokemo+F8
Perhaps they meant censure instead of censor.
replies(2): >>o11c+zG >>adastr+281
◧◩◪
5. astura+Ha[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-12-28 14:15:48
>>Pokemo+F8
>I'm sorry but now we surely have lost the meaning of the word censored. Now it means not getting to play chess in a tournament?

Yes, we have. That ship has sailed long ago.

But, in this context, specifically, the GP might have meant 'censured' instead of 'censored' and it was autocorrect or mental confusion.

replies(1): >>Pokemo+dn
◧◩◪◨
6. Pokemo+dn[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-12-28 16:06:03
>>astura+Ha
That makes more sense. Sorry about that.
◧◩◪◨
7. o11c+zG[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-12-28 18:24:44
>>chucks+8a
Note especially that in many languages "censor" and "censure" are the same word.
◧◩◪◨
8. adastr+281[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-12-28 21:21:18
>>chucks+8a
I did indeed.
[go to top]