zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. Michae+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-12-13 01:34:48
How does that relate to the phenomena of regression to the mean?
replies(1): >>TeMPOr+a1
◧
2. TeMPOr+a1[view] [source] 2024-12-13 01:48:08
>>Michae+(OP)
In that it's tricky to identify the right mean to measure the regression against.
replies(1): >>Michae+z4
◧◩
3. Michae+z4[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-12-13 02:36:17
>>TeMPOr+a1
It doesn’t matter which one you pick, there are no known exceptions to the general phenomena.

That’s why I said by definition.

replies(1): >>Danmct+8v
◧◩◪
4. Danmct+8v[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-12-13 09:20:51
>>Michae+z4
By what definition? It's certainly possible that some kind of societal bell curve or other distribution can just keep getting wider without meaningful movement of the relative positions of individuals. I don't understand why you assume the most likely behavior is regression to the mean. Especially on short terms that seems weird to assume
replies(1): >>Michae+kI
◧◩◪◨
5. Michae+kI[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-12-13 12:37:27
>>Danmct+8v
Who is assuming a short term?
[go to top]