zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. notthe+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-12-10 00:35:00
Brandshield has been deleting and rewriting their non-statement deflecting responsibility repeatedly while hiding all the comments calling out their cascade of BS. Here is their current statement blaming iwantmyname and link to the hidden replies:

> We want to address recent reports surrounding a website takedown.

> BrandShield serves as a trusted partner to many brands. Our AI-driven platform detects potential threats and provides analysis, and in this case, an abuse was identified from an @itchio subdomain.

> We identified and reported the infringement, and requested a takedown of the URL in question – not of the entire http://itch.io domain. The temporary takedown of the website was a decision made by the service providers, not BrandShield.

> BrandShield remains committed to supporting our clients by identifying potential digital threats and infringements. We encourage platforms to implement stronger self-regulation systems that prevent such issues from escalating.

https://twitter.com/BrandShieldltd/status/186616148952818098...

Note: they are non specific about how the "abuse" was submitted to iwantmyname as "fraud and phishing", not "copyright infringement", so they are covering up their fuckup.

replies(2): >>vintag+S2 >>kjs3+g6
2. vintag+S2[view] [source] 2024-12-10 00:58:20
>>notthe+(OP)
Love that last part.

> We encourage platforms to implement stronger self-regulation systems that prevent such issues from escalating.

Clear blame.

replies(1): >>kjs3+a7
3. kjs3+g6[view] [source] 2024-12-10 01:29:33
>>notthe+(OP)
BrandShield serves as a trusted partner

Obviously, that trust is wildly misplaced.

◧◩
4. kjs3+a7[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-12-10 01:37:38
>>vintag+S2
"You as the innocent party should have prevented us from shitting on you. This is really on you.". Like, "if you didn't want to get hit by a car you shouldn't have been walking on the sidewalk".

Utter scum.

[go to top]