zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. Mindwi+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-12-09 14:08:55
Given the OP and admin in the comments explicitly say that this wasn't a DMCA claim it would rather hurt any campaign to lie and say it was.
replies(1): >>tremon+Z3
◧
2. tremon+Z3[view] [source] 2024-12-09 14:43:40
>>Mindwi+(OP)
But the DMCA is the only legal mechanism for demanding swift action from a registrar/hosting party without the involvement of a judge, at least FAFAIK. So if this wasn't a DMCA takedown, then the registrar was acting completely of their own volition and should be liable for all fallout.
replies(1): >>qingch+sm
◧◩
3. qingch+sm[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-12-09 16:43:52
>>tremon+Z3
No, sadly it's not. These are private companies.. if you write to them and tell them to take a site down for "reasons" and they think the "reasons" are good enough, they'll do it.
[go to top]